MCP Server: Plug-and-Play AI Integrations at Scale

June 22, 2025

What Is an MCP Server?

Definition (from Anthropic’s spec): “An MCP server is a standalone process that implements the Model Context Protocol, exposing a set of JSON-RPC 2.0 methods to read, write, and query contextual data for large language models” (source).

An MCP server sits between your AI model and a backend system—be it a database, code repository, or custom API—and translates JSON-RPC calls into native API requests.

  • Standard Interface: Core RPC methods include read, write, search, and execute, each taking a JSON payload and returning structured JSON.
  • Security & Isolation: Deployed in its own container or process, enforcing scopes and permissions so models only see allowed data.
  • Polyglot SDKs: Official SDKs in TypeScript and Python accelerate server setup.

Example: A TypeScript MCP server for GitHub might implement search by proxying GraphQL:

app.post('/jsonrpc', async (req, res) => { const { method, params, id } = req.body; if (method === 'search') { const result = await githubClient.query(params.query); res.json({ jsonrpc: '2.0', result, id }); } });

Why Anthropic Open-Sourced MCP

Before MCP, connector count scaled as:

Connectors=N×D,\text{Connectors} = N \times D,

where NN=number of AI models and DD=data sources. MCP reduces this to:

ConnectorsMCP=N+D.\text{Connectors}_{\mathrm{MCP}} = N + D.

Example: Supporting 3 models (Claude, GPT-4, Llama) and 5 sources (GitHub, Postgres, Slack, Redis, Salesforce):

  • Without MCP: 3 × 5 = 15 connectors
  • With MCP: 3 + 5 = 8 components

Open-sourcing MCP enables:

  1. Best-Practice Reference: A battle-tested implementation to avoid reinvention.
  2. Ecosystem Growth: Community adapters for niche tools.
  3. Interoperability: Any model can leverage any MCP-compatible service.

Under the Hood: Protocol & Architecture

  1. Transport: JSON-RPC 2.0 over HTTP/WebSocket.

  2. Discovery: Clients fetch a server’s capabilities list at startup.

  3. Invocation: RPC requests, e.g.:

    { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "read", "params": { "path": "/docs/index.md" }, "id": 1 }
  4. Response: Server replies:

    { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": { "content": "..." }, "id": 1 }

Example Workflow:

  1. Model prompts “read /invoices/12345.json.”
  2. Client issues read RPC to MCP-Invoice server.
  3. Server fetches and returns JSON.
  4. Model uses invoice data in context.

This mirrors the Language Server Protocol for IDEs.


Scalability Challenges of MCP Servers

MCP simplifies connectors but adds performance factors:

  1. RPC Latency (LrpcL_{rpc}):

    Lrpc=Lnet+Lser/deser+Lhandler,L_{rpc} = L_{net} + L_{ser/deser} + L_{handler},
    • LnetL_{net} = network RTT (0.5–2 ms)
    • Lser/deserL_{ser/deser} = JSON (≈0.2 ms)
    • LhandlerL_{handler} = API call CPU time
  2. CPU-bound Context Assembly:

    Wk×(Cjson+Capi),W \approx k \times (C_{json} + C_{api}),

    aggregating from kk servers per prompt.

  3. Concurrency Limits:

    T=Lλ,T = \frac{L}{\lambda},

    from Little’s Law; too many in-flight requests spike latency.

  4. Batching Trade-offs: Batching nn calls cuts overhead but raises memory use (O(n)O(n)) and error complexity.

Mitigations:

  • Horizontal Scaling: Deploy multiple MCP instances behind a load balancer.
  • Adaptive Batching: Increase batch size when CPU < 50%.
  • Protocol Caching: Cache frequent responses in Redis for 5 minutes.

Real-World Impact & Data

  • Benchmark (Anthropic): A 4‑core MCP-Postgres server manages ~5,000 read calls/sec with p95 latency < 20 ms.
  • Enterprise Example: FinCorp swapped eight ETL scripts for MCP, cutting integration code by 70% and deployment time from days to hours.
  • Ecosystem: 12+ community MCP adapters for Redis, Elasticsearch, Stripe, etc. (list).

Key Takeaways for Architects

  1. Connector vs. Protocol Complexity: Fewer connectors, higher per-request CPU/network load.
  2. Benchmark Early: Use tools like wrk or JMeter to measure LrpcL_{rpc} and throughput.
  3. Design for Scale: Autoscale on CPU > 70%, implement client caches.
  4. Capability Bundling: Group methods to minimize servers per prompt.

Join the Discussion

Share your thoughts and insights about this tutorial.